Skip to main content

Full text of "The birth of invention"

See other formats


- 


■  ■■• 


:     ■% 


(d0  8 


PROCEEDINGS   OF   THE    CONGRESS. 


403 


THE  BIRTH  OF  INVENTION. 

By  Professor  Otis  T.  Mason,  Ph.  D.,  of  Virginia,  Curator 
U.  S.  National  Museum. 


b 


PROCEEDINGS   OF    THE    CONGRESS.  403 


THE  BIRTH  OF  INVENTION. 

By  Professor   Otis  T.  Mason,  Ph.  D.,  of  Virginia,  Curator 
U.  S.  National  Museum. 


' '  What  a  plastic  little  creature  man  is !  so  shifty,  so  adaptive !  his 
body  a  chest  of  tools,  and  he  making  himself  comfortable  in  every 
climate,  in  every  condition." — Emerson. 

In  this  apotheosis  of  invention  and  inventors,  to  me  has 
been  assigned  the  pleasing  task  of  leading  you  back  for  a  few 
moments  to  the  cradle  of  humanity.  Those  are  happy  hours 
to  most  of  us  when  we  recall  the  days  of  childhood.  To 
trace  the  lives  of  celebrated  men  and  women  to  the  springs 
of  their  moral  and  intellectual  power  brings  never-fading 
delight.  To  study  the  rise  and  progress  of  a  nation  or  any 
social  unit  is  worthy  of  exalted  minds.  But  the  most  profitable 
inquiry  of  all  is  the  search  for  the  origin  of  epoch-making 
ideas  in  order  to  comprehend  the  history  of  civilization,  to 
conjure  up  those  race  memories  in  which  each  people  trans- 
mits to  itself  and  to  posterity  its  former  experiences. 

Every  invention  of  any  importance  is  the  nursery  of  future 
inventions,  the  cradle  of  a  sleeping  Hercules.  But  my  task  is 
to  speak  of  primitive  man  and  his  efforts. 

It  will  aid  us  in  prosecuting  our  journey  backward  to  orient 
ourselves  with  reference  to  the  present.  For  two  days  we  have 
listened  to  the  eloquent  papers  of  my  predecessors,  written,  to 
glorify  the  nineteenth  century.  Through  this,  faculty  of  inven- 
tion the  whole  earth  is  man's.  There  is  not  a  ldne  island  fit 
for  his  abode  whereon  some  Alexander  Selkirk  has  not  made 
a  home.  Every  mineral,  plant  and  animal  is  so  far  known 
that  a  place  has  been  found  for  it  in  his  Systema  Naturce. 
Every  creature  is  subject  to  man  ;  the  winds,  the  seas,  the 
sunshine,  the  lightning  do  his  bidding.  Projecting  his  vision 
beyond  his  tiny  planet,  this  inventing  animal  has  catalogued 
and  traced  the  motion  of  every  star. 

But  his  crowning  glory  (which  always  fills  me  with  admira- 
tion)   is   his   ever-increasing   comprehensiveness: 'After   cen- 

PvMAY 


404  PROCEEDINGS   OF    THE    CONGRESS. 

turies  of  cultivating  acquaintance  with  the  discrete  phe- 
nomena around  him,  he  has  now  striven  to  coordinate  them, 
to  mate  them  organic,  to  read  S3^stem  into  them.  He  has 
learned  by  degrees  to  comprehend  all  things  as  parts  of  a  single 
mechanism.  Sir  Isaac  Newton  and  Kepler  conceived  all  objects 
and  all  worlds  to  be  held  by  universal  gravitation.  And  thus, 
in  our  century,  von  Baer  and  Humboldt  taught  that  the 
world,  in  all  its  forces  and  materials,  is  an  integrated  cosmos. 
Any  one  who  is  the  least  familiar  with  the  progress  of  philos- 
ophy will  recall  that  since  the  dawn  of  written  history  the 
thoughts  of  men  were  tending  to  this  unification.  Shortly 
after  this  first  effort  at  comprehensive  unity  Mayer,  Rumford 
and  Joule  invented  the  methods  of  demonstrating  the  oneness 
of  physical  forces,  the  conservation  of  energy.  Wollaston, 
Kirchoff  and  Bunsen  devised  the  delicate  apparatus  to  prove 
the  chemical  identity  of  all  worlds.  I^amarck,  Geoffroy  St. 
Hilaire  and  Darwin  taught  the  consanguinity  of  all  living 
beings.  Helmholtz  and  Meyer  coordinated  nervous  excitation 
with  mental  activity.  Comte  and  Spencer  grasped  the  unity 
of  all  sensible  phenomena.  Newton,  L,eibnitz  and  Hamilton 
projected  their  minds  beyond  phenomena  and  invented  mathe- 
matics of  four  or  more  dimensions,  conceiving  of  worlds  and 
systems  that  under  the  present  order  of  nature  can  have  no 
objective  reality.  Over  all  this,  into  many  great  souls,  have 
come  the  notions  of  infinite  space  and  time  and  causation. 
The  idea  of  limitation  to  thought  or  achievement  no  longer 
enters  the  imagination.  The  depth  of  the  sea,  the  distances 
of  the  stars,  the  concealment  of  the  earth's  treasures,  the 
minuteness  of  the  springs  of  life  and  sense,  the  multiplicity 
and  complicity  of  phenomena  are  only  so  many  incitements  to 
greater  achievements.  The  daring  souls  of  this  decade  are 
determined  at  any  risk  to  answer  the  inquiry  of  Pontius 
Pilate,  What  is  truth  ?  With  sympathetic  enthusiasm  we  wave 
them  on,  bidding  them  god-speed. 

But,  I  ask  you  now  to  forget  all  this  and  go  with  me  to  that 
early  day  when  the  first  being,  worthy  to  be  called  man,  stood 
upon  this  earth.  How  economical  has  been  his  endowment. 
There  is  no  hair  on  his  body  to  keep  him  warm,  his  jaws  are 
the  feeblest  in  the  world,  his  arm  is  not  equal  to  that  of  a  go- 


PROCEEDINGS    OF   THE    CONGRESS.  405 

rilla,  lie  cannot  fly  like  the  eagle,  lie  cannot  see  into  the  night 
like  the  owl,  even  the  hare  is  fleeter  than  he.  He  has  no  cloth- 
ing, no  shelter.  ' '  Foxes  had  holes,  and  the  birds  of  the  air 
had  nests,  but  this  man  had  not  where  to  lay  his  head."  He 
had  no  tools  or  industries  or  experience,  no  society  or  lan- 
guage or  arts  of  pleasure,  he  had  yet  no  theory  of  life  and 
poorer  conceptions  of  the  life  beyond. 

All  nature  laughed  at  him.  The  sun  said,  I  will  blister  his 
skin.  The  storm  said,  I  will  spit  upon  him.  The  sea  said,  I 
will  drown  him.  The  noxious  malaria  said,  I  will  parch  him 
with  fevers.  The  lion,  the  wolf,  the  tiger  said,  I  will 
devour  him.  The  mountain  sheep  withheld  her  fleece  and 
lambs.  The  wild  ass  and  the  wild  horse  fled  away  in  scorn. 
The  silly  fish  said,  I  know  you  not,  and  the  birds  skimmed 
the  air  around  him  in  mockery.  There  were  no  waving  grain 
fields,  nor  golden  cornfields,  nor  tempting  vineyards,  nor 
fragrant  orchards. 

"Poor  naked  wretches,  on  the  edge  of  time, 
That  bide  the  pelting  of  this  pitiless  storm, 
How  shall  your  houseless  heads  and  unfed  sides  defend  you 
From  seasons  such  as  these  ?  " 

King  Lear,  tit,  i. 

Whatever  we  may  say  of  our  own  golden  age,  surely  his 
was  not  around  him  nor  above  him.  If  he  had  one  at  all  it  was 
within  him. 

"Heaven  flowed  upon  the  soul  in  many  dreams  of  high  desire." 

— Tennyson^  "The  Poet." 

The  road  from  that  condition  to  our  own  lies  next  to  the  in- 
finite. The  one  endowment  that  this  creature  possessed  hav- 
ing in  it  the  promise  and  potency  of  all  future  achievements, 
was  the  creative  spark  called  invention.  The  superabundant 
brain  over  and  above  all  the  amount  required  for  mere  animal 
existence,  held  in  trust  the  possibilities  of  the  future,  and 
stamped  upon  man  the  divine  likeness.  This  naked  ignoramus 
is  the  father  of  the  clothed  philosopher,  looking  out  into  infin- 
ite space  and  time  and  causation.  It  may  give  you  pleasure 
to  know  something  about  the  connections  between  these  two 
and  the  witnesses  to  these  connections. 


406  PROCEEDINGS   OF    THE    CONGRESS. 

There  are  five  guides  whose  services  we  have  to  engage  on 
our  interesting  journey.  The  first  is  History,  who  does  not 
know  the  way  very  far  back — not  over  three  thousand  years — 
with  much  certainty.  The  second  is  Philoo&pby,  the  study  of  "^J^ 
which  in  our  own  century  has  enabled  us  to  find  the  cradle- 
land  of  many  peoples.  The  third  is  Folk-Lore,  the  survival  of 
belief  and  custom  among  the  uneducated.  The  fourth  is  Arch- 
aeology, history  written  in  things.  The  fifth  is  Ethnology, 
which  informs  us  that  in  describing  this  arc  of  civilization  some 
races  have  only  marked  time,  while  others  have  moved  with 
radii  of  varying  lengths.  The  result  of  this  is  that  we  now 
have  on  the  earth  types  of  every  sort  of  culture  it  has  ever 
known.  At  the  present  moment,  within  hailing  distance  of  yon- 
der most  beautiful  dome  in  the  world  dwell  all  these  witnesses 
— the  relics  of  the  stone  age,  the  Indian  village  of  Nacochtank 
or  Anacostia,  the  folk-lore  of  both  continents,  and  the  litera- 
tures of  the  world.  While  you  are  listening  to  the  encomiums 
of  our  decade,  palaeolithic  man  sends  in  the  testimony  of  his 
handicraft,  the  Smithsonian  Institution  treasures  the  inventions 
of  the  most  primitive  races,  and  the  Bureau  of  Ethnology  un- 
ravels the  mysteries  of  savage  tongues. 

As  the  fragment  of  a  speech  or  song,  a  waking  or  a  sleeping 
vision,  the  dream  of  a  vanished  hand,  a  draught  of  water  from 
a  familiar  spring,  the  almost  perished  fragrance  of  a  pressed 
flower,  call  back  the  singer,  the  loved  and  lost,  the  loved  and 
won,  the  home  of  childhood,  or  the  parting  hour,  so  in  the 
same  manner  there  linger  in  this  crowning  decade  of  the  crown- 
ing century  bits  of  ancient  ingenuity  which  recall  to  a  whole 
people  the  fragrance  and  beauty  of  its  past. 

From  the  testimony  of  these  five  witnesses  we  learn  that 
there  never  was  a  time  when  man  was  not  an  inventor — never 
a  time  when  he  had  not  some  sort  of  patent  on  his  invention. 
They  affirm  that  every  art  of  living  and  all  the  arts  of  pleasure 
were  born  in  the  stone  age  ;  that  graphic  art,  sculpture,  archi- 
tecture, painting,  music  and  the  drama,  had  their  childish  pro- 
totypes in  that  early  day  ;  that  language  is  one  of  the  very 
earliest  of  inventions,  the  vehicle  of  savage  oratory,  philosophy 
and  science.  They  affirm  that  society  has  been  a  series  of  in- 
ventions from  the  first ;  that  legislation,  justice,  government, 


PROCEEDINGS    OF    THE  CONGRESS.  407 

property,  exchange,  commerce,  have  not  sprung  out  of  the 
ground  but  within  our  definition  are  inventions.  And  even  the 
creeds  and  cults  of  mankind,  whatever  view  you  may  take  of 
the  divine  element  underneath  them,  have  been  thought  out 
and  wrought  out  with  infinite  pains  from  time  to  time  by  earn- 
est souls.  But  they  had  their  origin  in  the  cradle-land  and  in 
the  infancy  of  our  race.  What  we  enjoy  is  only  the  full-blown 
flower,  the  perfected  fruit  of  which  they  possessed  the  germ. 
I^et  me  enforce  this  idea,  as  we  glorify  the  material  prosperity 
of  the  nineteenth  century,  that  many  centuries  ago  men  sat 
down  and  with  great  pains  and  sorrow  invented  the  language, 
the  art,  the  industries,  the  social  order  which  made  our  machines 
feasible  and  desirable. 

There  is  no  conflict  between  the  testimony  of  these  witnesses 
and  the  doctrine  commonly  taught  that  men  do  not  invent 
customs  and  languages,  but  fall  into  them.  Reflect  a  moment 
upon  3Tour  own  daily  life  and  you  will  recognize  two  sets  of 
activity,  those  which  you  originate  and  those  in  which  you 
follow  suit.  Animals  can  learn  to  follow  suit,  and  to  a  very 
limited  extent  can  originate.  But  it  is  the  divine  spark  of 
originality  which  underlies  every  thought  or  device  in  this 
world.  As  one  man  invents  a  machine  and  others  by  thousands 
fall  into  the  use  of  it,  as  the  musician  composes  a  song  and 
millions  sing  it,  so  was  it  in  the  cradle-land  of  humanity,  the 
inventor,  touched  with  fire  from  the  divine  altar,  set  new 
examples  to  be  followed.  If  we  were  to  interrogate  our  five 
witnesses  particularly  with  reference  to  the  ancestry,  the 
family  tree  of  the  notable  inventions  of  the  nineteenth  century, 
their  answer  would  be  somewhat  as  follows.  We  ought  to 
remember,  however,  that  an  invention  is  not  always  a  thing  ; 
but  that  it  may  be  any  series  of  actions  conducing  toward  some 
new  end.  Keep  in  mind,  also,  that  all  our  activities  involve 
tools,  processes  and  products,  and  that  invention  may  take 
place  in  any  or  all  of  these. 

The  ancestor  of  the  steam  plow  is  the  digging-stick  of 
savagery,  a  branch  of  a  tree  sharpened  at  the  end  by  fire  ;  the 
progenitors  of  the  steam  harvester  and  thresher  were  the  stone 
sickle,  the  roasting-tray,  or,  later  on,  the  tribulum. 


4©8  PROCEEDINGS   OF    THE    CONGRESS. 

The  cotton  gin  and  power  loom  are  among  the  wonders  of 
our  age.  Yet  in  that  day  of  which  we  are  speaking  human 
fingers  wrought  the  textile  from  first  to  last.  They  gathered 
the  bark  or  wool,  colored  them  to  suit  the  primitive  taste,  spun 
and  wove  them  with  simple  apparatus  and  left  upon  the  fabric 
patterns  that  are  the  despair  of  all  modern  machine-makers — 
patterns  that  are  a  pleasure  to  the  eye  by  their  infinite  variety, 
replaced  in  modern  fabrics  by  a  dreary  monotony  that  awakens 
pain  instead  of  pleasure. 

The  first  sewing-machine  was  a  needle  or  bodkin  of  bone, 
with  dainty  sinew  thread  from  the  leg  of  the  antelope,  and  for 
thimble  a  little  leather  cap  over  the  ends  of  the  fingers. 
Coarse,  indeed,  the  apparatus,  but  the  hand  was  deft,  the  eye 
was  true,  the  sense  of  beauty  was  there,  and  so  that  needle- 
woman of  long  ago  wrought  in  fur  from  the  mammals,  feathers 
from  the  birds,  grasses  from  the  fields,  shells  from  the  sea, 
wings  from  the  beetle  and  skins  of  snakes,  with  tasteful  geometric 
figures.  You  do  err  who  think  those  ancient  needlewomen 
had  no  taste.  It  would  be  hard  to  invent  a  pattern  now  that 
was  unfamiliar  to  them. 

The  first  engine  was  run  by  man  power,  then  man  subdued 
the  horse,  the  ass,  the  camel  and  invented  engines  for  those  to 
propel.  He  next  domesticated  the  winds,  the  waters,  the 
steam,  the  lightning,  but  the  first  common  carriers  and  machine 
power  were  men  and  women.  The  first  burden  train  was 
women's  backs  ;  the  first  passenger  car  was  a  papoose  frame. 
And  even  now,  while  I  am  speaking  to  you,  more  heavy  loads 
are  resting  on  human  shoulders  than  upon  all  the  pack  animals 
in  the  world.     Hence  our  nursery  rhyme — 

Rock  a  by  baby  on  a  tree  top, 
When  the  wind  blows 
The  cradle  will  rock. 
When  the  bough  bends, 
The  cradle  will  fall. 
Down  will  come  cradle, 
And  baby  and  all. 

The  poetry  of  to-day  is  the  fact  of  yesterday,  the  dream  of 
yesterday  is  the  fact  of  to-day.  When  the  savage  woman  a 
century  or  two  ago,  upon  this  very  spot,  strapped  her  dusky 


PROCEEDINGS   OF   THE   CONGRESS.  4°9 

offspring  to  a  rude  frame,  hung  it  upon  the  nearest  sapling  for 
the  winds  to  rock,  or  lifted  the  unfortunate  suckling  from  the 
ground  to  which  it  had  been  hurled  by  the  bending  of  an  unsafe 
bough,  that  was  a  fact,  a  stage  in  the  history  of  invention.  In 
our  now-a-days  couches  of  down,  swung  from  gilded  hinges, 
we  have  got  far  ahead  of  the  papoose  cradle,  the  memory  of 
which  we  perpetuate  in  nursery  rhymes  sung  to  children,  who 
wonder  why  babies  should  be  hung  in  the  tops  of  trees  and 
think,  doubtless,  that  the  falling  cradle  was  a  just  retribution 
on  the  silly  parents. 

What  is  more  beautiful  than  an  ocean  steamer,  with  skin  of 
steel  drawn  over  ribs  of  steel  and  closed  above  against  the  in- 
trusion of  the  waves.  Have  you  never  seen  the  picture  of  the 
Eskimo,  still  in  the  stone  age,  who,  over  a  framework  of  drift 
wood  or  whale's  rib,  stretches  a  covering  of  sealskin  and  learned 
therein  to  defy  the  waves  hundreds  of  years  ago  ? 

Only  now  and  then  the  angry  sky  was  lighted  for  the  primi- 
tive man  by  electricity,  and  even  then  it  filled  him  with  terror. 
But  it  was  he  that  invented  the  apparatus  for  conjuring  from 
dried  wood,  by  a  rude  sort  of  dynamo,  the  Promethean  spark. 
It  was  our  Aryan  ancestors  that  paid  their  devotions  to  the 
rising  sun  by  kindling  fresh  fire  every  morning  as  the  orb  of 
day  flashed  his  first  beam  across  the  earth. 

Who  has  not  read  with  almost  breaking  heart  the  story  of 
Paliss3r,  the  Huguenot  potter.  But  what  have  our  witnesses 
to  say  of  that  long  line  of  humble  creatures  that  conjured  out 
of  prophetic  clay,  without  wheel  or  furnace,  forms  and  decora- 
tions of  imperishable  beauty,  which  are  now  being  copied  in 
glorified  material  in  the  best  factories  of  the  world  ?  In  ceramic 
as  well  as  in  textile  art  the  first  inventors  were  women.  They 
quarried  the  clay,  manipulated  it,  constructed  and  decorated 
the  ware,  burned  it  in  a  rude  furnace  and  wore  it  out  in  a 
hundred  uses. 

He  had  no  printing  press,  but  he  could  tie  knots  in  a 
marvelous  fashion  and  write  letters  on  bark  or  on  bits  of  raw  hide 
and  leave  memorials  of  himself  in  the  book  of  stone.  He 
made  words  and  sentences,  invented  language,  developed 
artistic  forms  of  speech  handed  down  to  us  in  the  eloquent 


41  o  PROCEEDINGS  OF  THE  CONGRESS. 

harangues  of  his  sages.  He  breathed  his  thoughts  in  poetry, 
a  kind  of  childish  rhythm. 

In  the  time  of  which  we  now  are  speaking  the  telegraph  was  a 
series  of  signal  fires  and  a  marvelous  code  of  signs,  which  a 
distinguished  scholar  of  our  city  has  just  unraveled. 

Primitive  man  developed  the  art  of  war,  means  of  offense 
and  defense  ;  weapons  of  percussion,  for  cutting  and  thrusting  ; 
projectiles,  armor,  fortification,  strategy. 

Nowhere  has  man  pressed  his  hand  so  effectively  upon  nature 
as  in  the  domestication  of  animals.  It  is  almost  incredible  that 
ravening  wolves  and  merciless  felines  should  become  faithful 
dogs  and  purring  cats  ;  that  the  wild  sheep  and  goat  should 
descend  from  their  inaccessible  fastnesses,  and  yield  their  fleece 
and  flesh  and  milk ;  that  horses,  asses,  camels,  elephants, 
should  be  induced  to  lend  their  backs  and  limbs  to  lighten  the 
loads  of  the  first  common  carrier.  This  process  of  impressing 
his  own  qualities  on  wild  creatures  began  very  early  in  history 
and  has  continued  uninterruptedly  from  first  to  last. 

In  the  uncertainty  of  the  marriage  relation  and  of  paternity, 
he  provided  every  woman  with  support  and  every  child  with  a 
home,  through  his  ingenious  gentile  system. 

His  affairs  of  state"  were  managed  through  his  patent  sys- 
tem. The  great  inventors  were  made  the  rulers  of  the  people, 
and  his  highest  title  to  nobility  was  a  most  puissant  and  inge- 
nious one. 

He  had  courts  of  justice,  heard  witnesses,  executed  his  laws. 
It  is  true  that  the  methods  were  summary,  when  a  chancery 
suit  was  settled  by  an  execution  on  the  same  day  as  the  death 
of  the  devisor.  But  out  of  his  struggles  came  our  methods, 
and  the  greatest  drawback  to  securing  justice  now  is  the  survi- 
val of  his  antiquated  customs  into  our  new  practices. 

He  invented  philosophies  and  sciences,  explained  the  uni- 
verse and  himself  to  himself.  This  seems  puerile  now,  but  it 
was  the  beginning  of  all  our  own  speculations,  necessary  to  us 
at  present,  but  which  will  to-morrow  become  folk-lore.  Over 
and  over  again,  those  who  preceded  me  on  this  platform  have 
pointed  to  James  Watt  as  the  true  deliverer  of  mankind.  Far  be 
it  from  me  to  take  one  leaf  from  his  laurel  crown  ;  but  the  in- 
ventor of  the  alphabet,  of  the  decimal  system  of  notation,  of 


PROCEEDINGS   OF    THE    CONGRESS.  411 

representative  government,  of  the  golden  rule  in  morality,  were 
greater  than  he. 

For  the  dream  in  stone  and  carving  and  decoration  called  a 
cathedral, 

"Where,  through  long-drawn  aisle  and  fretted  vault, 
The  pealing  anthem  swells  the  notes  of  praise," 

that  early  day  has  only  to  offer  wild  shouts  in  unison  under  the 
starlit  dome,  touched  by  the  first  childish  aspirations  after  the 
divine  or  hopes  of  immortality. 

While  you  look  with  admiration  upon  these  panoramas  of 
progress  you  cannot  have  failed  to  observe  on  the  canvas  that 
the  art,  the  process  of  inventing  itself,  has  undergone  the  very 
same  development  and  improvement  as  the  things  invented. 
There  is  in  this  a  marvelous  similarity  to  the  life  processes  of 
animals  and  plants.  The  homogeneous  yolk  of  the  egg  during 
incubation  becomes  wonderfully  complex  and  heterogeneous  ; 
but  all  of  these  diverse  parts  come  together  into  a  higher  unity, 
in  which  each  organ  ministers  to  the  good  of  all.  The  earliest 
invention  was  a  single  homogeneous  act,  an  original  suggestion, 
a  happy  thought.  The  patent  on  this  was  an  immediate  and 
individual  benefit.  A  sharper  knife  of  flint,  a  better  scraper, 
a  longer  spear,  a  stouter  thread  wrought  better,  and  the  reward 
was  more  execution.  Now,  the  man  who  made  the  best  weapons 
killed  the  most  game,  from  that  game  he  got  better  food,  that  food 
made  him  stronger,  that  strength  made  him  chief,  that  chief- 
taincy gave  him  more  wives,  more  children,  more  cohorts  to  sup- 
port his  throne.  The  best  woman  to  cook  or  sew  or  carry  loads 
got  the  best  husband;  that  was  her  patent.  From  these  simple 
methods  of  inventing  and  rewarding  invention  we  come  on  to  the 
Olympic  games,  the  monopolies,  the  patent  system.  And  now, 
in  the  inventor's  laboratory  of  Graham  Bell  or  Edison  the  climax 
is  reached,  where  one  machine  is  the  cooperative  result  of  any 
number  of  trained  minds,  and  the  reward  is  meted  out  to  each  by 
the  manufacturer;  or,  in  this  Patent  Congress  itself,  we  may  have 
a  still  more  highly  organized  unit,  wherein  the  inventors  of 
America  become  a  body  social,  and  together  shake  hands  under 
the  sea  with  the  Emperor  of  Germany,  who  sends  his  congratu- 
lations to-day  on  the  occasion  of  our  meeting. 


412  PROCEEDINGS   OF    THE    CONGRESS. 

We  are  assembled  to  glorify  the  first  century  of  American 
patents.  A  few  months  ago  the  disciples  of  Daguerre  met 
in  our  city  and  set  up  in  the  National  Museum  a  monument  to 
the  inventor  of  photography.  I  do  not  know  that  there  is 
another  memorial  in  America  to  an  inventor.  There  is  no 
better  way  to  insure  for  posterity  the  recollection  of  this  day 
than  by  stimulating  among  the  great  industries  the  desire  to 
continue  this  good  work  of  memorializing  their  founders.  Per- 
haps you  may  not  build  your  monument  of  stone  or  bronze, 
you  may  set  up  a  library,  you  may  solicit  a  corner  in  the 
National  Museum  or  Congressional  library,  or  you  may  secure 
a  better  Patent  building. 

In  our  public  places  we  set  up  statues  of  the  destroyers  of 
mankind  and  erect  monuments  in  our  national  cemeteries  to 
the  anonymous  dead.  When  we  go  to  hang  garlands  upon 
the  eulogium-bearing  tombs,  we  do  not  forget  to  scatter  flowers 
upon  the  mausoleum  of  the  unknown. 

We  cannot  gather  from  the  four  corners  of  the  world  the 
bones  of  all  the  great  inventors  and  honor  them  with  a  costly 
burial.  Even  their  names  have  perished  from  the  records  of 
mankind,  but  their  works  endure.  What  better  can  we  do 
than  to  gather  these1  and  guard  them  in  our  great  museums, 
mute  witnesses  of  antiquated  arts.  I  can  imagine  these  anony- 
mous inventors  looking  upon  us  to-day  and  glad  of  this  tardy 
recognition  of  their  vicarious  sufferings. 

With  loving  recollection  of  your  labors  I  pluck  a  flower 
from  my  heart  and  strew  its  petals  over  your  neglected  graves  : 

"  In  freta  dumfhivii  current,  dum  montibus  umbra 
lustrabunt  convexa,  polus  dum  sidera  pascet, 
semper  honos  nomenque  tuum  laudesque  manebunt, 
quae  me  cumque  vocant  terrse."     Aneid  i,  607. 


PROCEEDINGS    OF    THE   CONGRESS.  413 


AMERICAN  INVENTIONS  AND  DISCOVERIES  IN 
MEDICINE,  SURGERY  AND  PRACTICAL  SANITA- 
TION. 

By  John  S.  Busings,  M.  D.,  Surgeon  U.  S.  A.,  Curator,  United 
States  Army  Medicae  Museum. 


In  connection  with  this  celebration  of  a  century's  work  of 
the  American  Patent  System,  I  have  been  requested  by  the 
Advisor}'  Committee  to  prepare  a  brief  paper  upon  inventions 
and  discoveries  in  medicine,  surgery  and  practical  sanitation, 
with  special  reference  to  the  progress  that  has  been  made  in 
this  country  in  these  branches  of  science  and  art. 

It  would  be  impossible  to  present  on  this  occasion  such  a 
summary  as  would  be  of  any  special  interest  or  use,  of  the  pro- 
gress which  has  been  made  in  medicine  and  sanitation  during 
the  century,  either  by  the  world  at  large  or  by  American 
physicians  and  sanitarians  in  particular  ;  and  I  shall  therefore 
confine  my  remarks  mainly  to  the  progress  which  has  been 
made  in  these  branches  in  connection  with  mechanical  inven- 
tions and  new  chemical  combinations  devised  by  American 
inventors — which  will  require  much  less  time. 

The  application  of  the  patent  system  to  medicine  in  this 
country  has  had  its  advantages  for  certain  people,  has  given 
employment  to  a  considerable  amount  of  capital  in  production 
(and  to  a  much  larger  amount  in  advertising),  has  contributed 
materially  to  the  revenues  of  the  government,  and  has  made  a 
great  deal  of  work  for  the  medical  profession. 

So  far  as  I  know,  but  one  complete  system  of  medicine  has 
been  patented  in  this  country,  and  that  was  the  steam,  Cayenne 
pepper  and  lobelia  system — commonly  known  as  Thomsonian- 
ism — to  which  a  patent  was  granted  in  1836.  The  right  to 
practice  this  system,  with  a  book  describing  the  methods,  was 
sold  by  the  patentee  for  twenty  dollars,  and  perhaps  some  of 
you  may  have  some  reminiscences  of  it  connected  with  your 


414  PROCEEDINGS   OF    THE    CONGRESS. 

boyish  days.  I  am  certain  I  shall  never  forget  the  effects  of 
"Composition  Powder,"  or  of  "Number  Six,"  which  was 
essentially  a  concentrated  tincture  of  Cayenne  pepper,  and 
one  dose  of  which  was  enough  to  make  a  boy  willing  to  go  to 
school  for  a  month. 

From  a  report  made  by  the  Commissioner  of  Patents  in  1849, 
it  appears  that  eighty-six  patents  for  medicines  had  been 
granted  up  to  that  date  ;  but  the  specificatons  of  most  of  those 
issued  before  1836  had  been  lost  by  fire.  The  greater  number 
of  patents  for  medicines  were  issued  between  1850  and  i860. 
The  total  number  of  patents  granted  for  medicines  during  the 
last  decade  (1880-1890)  is  540. r 

This,  however,  applies  only  to  ' '  patent  medicines, ' '  properly 
so-called,  the  claims  for  which  are,  for  the  most  part,  presented 
by  simple-minded  men  who  know  very  little  of  the  ways  of  the 
world.  A  patent  requires  a  full  and  unreserved  disclosure  of 
the  recipe,  and  the  mode  of  compounding  the  same,  for  the 
public  benefit  when  the  term  of  the  patent  shall  have  expired  ; 
and  the  Commissioner  of  Patents  may,  if  he  chooses,  require 
the  applicant  to  furnish  specimens  of  the  composition  and  of  its 
ingredients,  sufficient  in  quantity  for  the  purpose  of  experiment. 
The  law,  however,  does  not  require  the  applicant  to  furnish 
patients  to  be  experimented  on,  and  this  may  be  the  reason 
why  the  Commissioner  has  never  demanded  samples  of  the 
ingredients.  By  far  the  greater  number  of  the  owners  of  pana- 
ceas and  nostrums  are  too  shrewd  to  thus  publish  their  secrets, 
for  they  can  attain  their  purpose  much  better  under  the  law 
for  registering  trade-marks  and  labels,  designs  for  bottles  and 
packages,  and  copyrights  of  printed  matter,  which  are  less 
costly,  and  do  not  reveal  the  arcanum. 

These  proprietary  medicines  constitute  the  great  bulk  of 
what  the  public  call  ' '  patent  medicines. ' ' 

The  trade  in  patent  and  secret  remedies  has  been,  and  still  is, 
an  important  one.  We  are  a  bitters-and-pill-taking  people  ;  in 
the  fried  pork  and  salasratus  biscuit  regions  the  demand  for 
such  medicines  is  unfailing,  but  everywhere  they  are  found.     I 

1  For  these  figures,  and  other  data  used  in  this  paper  I  am  indebted  to 
m3'  friend  Mr.  H.  H.  Bates,  Chief  Examiner  in  the  Patent  Office. 


PROCEEDINGS   OF    THE   CONGRESS.  415 

suppose  the  chief  consumption  of  them  is  by  women  and  chil- 
dren— with  a  fair  allowance  of  clergymen,  if  we  may  judge 
from  the  printed  testimonials.  I  sampled  a  good  many  of  them 
myself  when  I  was  a  boy.  Of  course,  these  remarks  do  not 
apply  to  bitters.  One  of  the  latest  patents  is  for  a  device  to 
wash  pills  rapidly  down  the  throat. 

According  to  the  Census  of  1880  there  were  in  the  United 
States  592  establishments  devoted  to  the  manufacture  of  drugs 
and  chemicals,  the  capital  invested  being  $28,598,458,  and  the 
annual  value  of  the  product  $38,173,658,  while  there  were  563 
establishments  devoted  to  the  manufacture  of  patent  medicines 
and  compounds,  the  capital  invested  being  $10,620,880,  and 
the  value  of  the  product  $14, 682, 494. 2 

A  patent  automatic  doctor,  on  the  principle  of  ' '  put  a  quar- 
ter in  the  slot  and  take  out  the  pill  which  suits  your  case," 
has  been  proposed,  but  this  patent  is  said  to  be  of  Dutch  and 
not  of  American  origin.  The  idea  of  this  may  have  come 
from  Japan,  for  an  old  medicine  case  from  that  country  which 
I  possess,  has  four  compartments  filled  with  pills,  and  the 
label  says  that  those  in  the  first  compartment  are  good  for  all 
diseases  of  the  head,  those  in  the  second  for  all  diseases  of  the 
body,  those  in  the  third  for  all  diseases  of  the  limbs,  and  those 
in  the  fourth  are  a  sure  vermifuge. 

From  the  commercial  and  industrial  point  of  view  the  great 
importance  of  patent  and  proprietary  medicines  is  connected 
with  advertising.  The  problem  is  to  induce  people  to  pay 
twenty-five  cents  for  the  liver-encouraging,  silent-perambulat- 
ing, family  pills,  which  cost  three  cents.  Some  day  I  hope  that 
the  modern  professional  expert  in  advertising  will  favor  us  with 
his  views  as  to  the  nature  and  character  of  those  people  who 
were  induced  to  buy  Jones's  liver  pills  or  Slow's  specific  by 
means  of  a  huge  display  of  these  names  on  the  sides  and  roofs  of 
barns  and  outbuildings,  which  display  forms  such  a  prominent 
feature  in  many  of  our  American  landscapes,  as  seen  by  the 
traveler  on  the  railway.  I  suppose  there  must  be  such  peo- 
ple, for  I  have  a  high  estimate  of  the  business  shrewdness  of 
the  men  who  pay  for  these  abominations.     I   should   also   like 

2  See  the  Lancet,  October  5,  1889,  p.  683. 


416  PROCEEDINGS   OF    THE    CONGRESS. 

to  know  how  much  a  farmer  gets  for  allowing  his  buildings  to 
be  thus  defaced.  He  must  be  hard-up  ;  indeed  such  a  displa}^ 
indicates  that  the  place  is  probably  mortgaged  and  that  the 
poor  man  is  heavily  in  debt. 

Even  the  soap  advertisers  are  not  as  guilty  as  the  nostrum- 
makers  in  this  particular  st)de  of  nuisance,  although  they  far 
exceed  the  latter  in  viciousness  when  it  comes  to  applying  art 
to  ignoble  purposes.  The  connection  between  progress  in 
medicine  and  soap  advertisements  may  not  be  clear  to  you, 
but  it  exists  nevertheless,  for  many  of  these  soaps  make  work 
for  the  doctors  by  producing  skin  troubles. 

Upon  the  whole,  I  should  think  that  the  number  of  people 
who  would  take  some  trouble  to  avoid  purchasing  an  article 
which  is  thus  advertised  must  be  rapidly  increasing,  so  that 
such  displays  will  soon  be  no  longer  profitable.  The  great 
importance  of  advertising  does  not  relate  to  the  placard  or 
chromo  business,  but  to  its  relations  to  periodical  literature — 
to  the  daily  and  weekly  press  and  the  monthly  magazines  and 
journals. 

To  the  establishment  and  support  of  some  of  our  news- 
papers and  journals,  medical  as  well  as  others,  these  pro- 
prietary and  secret  medicines,  cosmetics,  food  preparations, 
etc.,  have  no  doubt  contributed  largely. 

I  am  sorry  to  say  that  I  have  been  unable  to  obtain  definite 
information  as  to  the  direct  benefits  which  inventions  of  this 
kind  have  conferred  on  the  public  in  the  way  of  the  cure  of 
disease  or  preventing  death.  Among  the  questions  which 
were  not  put  in  the  schedules  of  the  last  census  were  the  follow- 
ing, nainely :  Did  you  ever  take  any  patent  or  proprietary 
medicine  ?  If  so,  what  and  how  much,  and  what  was  the 
result  ?  Some  very  remarkable  statistics  would  no  doubt  have 
been  obtained  had  this  inquir}7  been  made.  I  can  only  say 
that  I  know  of  but  four  secret  remedies  which  have  been  really 
valuable  additions  to  the  resources  of  practical  medicine,  and 
the  composition  of  all  these  is  now  known.  These  four  are 
all  powerful  and  dangerous,  and  should  only  be  used  on  the 
advice  of  a  skilled  physician.  Most  of  such  remedies  have 
little  value  as  curative  agents,  and  some  of  them  are  prepared 


PROCEEDINGS   OF   THE    CONGRESS.  417 

and  purchased  almost  exclusively  for  immoral  or  criminal 
purposes. 

In  France  the  sale  of  secret  and  patent  medicines  is  not 
allowed  unless  they  have  been  examined  and  approved  by  the 
National  Academy  of  Medicine,  and  the  same  general  rule 
holds  good  in  Italy  and  Spain. 

The  Japanese  have  followed  the  French  method,  and  their 
experience  is  interesting.  The  Central  Sanitary  Bureau  estab- 
lished a  public  laboratory  for  the  analysis  of  chemicals  as  a 
medicine.  The  proprietors  of  each  of  such  medicines  were 
bound  to  present  samples,  and  the  names  and  proportions  of  the 
ingredients,  directions  for  its  use  and  explanations  of  its  sup- 
posed efficacy.  According  to  a  report  in  the  British  Medical 
Journal,  during  the  first  year  there  were  11,904  applicants  for 
license  to  prepare  and  sell  148,091  patent  and  secret  medicines. 
Permission  for  the  preparation  and  sale  of  58,638  different 
kinds  were  granted,  8,592  were  prohibited,  9,918  were  ordered 
to  be  discountenanced,  and  70,943  remained  to  be  reported  on. 
The  great  majority  of  those  which  were  authorized  were  of  no 
efficacy,  but  few  being  remedial  agents  ;  but  their  sale  was  not 
prohibited,  as  they  were  not  found  to  be  dangerous  to  the 
health  of  the  peopled  I  do  not  vouch  for  these  figures,  which 
throw  our  records  entirely  in  the  shade. 

In  1849  a  special  committee  of  the  House  of  Representatives 
reported  to  the  House  a  bill  to  prevent  the  patenting  of  medi- 
cines, accompanied  by  a  report.  This  bill  provided  that  after 
the  passage  of  the  act  letters-patent  shall  not  be  granted  for 
any  article  whatever  as  a  medicine,  provided  that  this  shall  not 
apply  to  machines,  instruments  or  apparatus.  When  the  matter 
came  before  the  House  for  consideration  the  bill  was  laid  on 
the  table.4 

You  are  all  aware  that  the  great  majority  of  the  medical 
profession  consider  it  to  be  improper  and  discreditable  for  a 
physician  to  patent  a  remedy.  The  Medical  Code  of  Ethics 
declares  that  it  is  derogatory  to  professional  character  "  for  a 
physician  to  hold  a  patent  for  any  surgical  instrument  or  medi- 


3  British  Medical  Journal,  July  3,  1880,  vol.  ii,  p.  24. 

4  Congressional  Globe,  March  3,  1849,  P-  697. 


418  PROCEEDINGS   OF    THE   CONGRESS. 

cine  ;  or  to  dispense  a  secret  nostrum  whether  it  be  the  com- 
position or  exclusive  property  of  himself  or  others.  For  if 
such  nostrum  be  of  real  efficacy,  any  concealment  regarding  it 
is  inconsistent  with  beneficence  and  professional  liberality  ;  and 
if  mystery  alone  give  it  value  and  importance,  such  craft  im- 
plies either  disgraceful  ignorance  or  fraudulent  avarice.  It  is 
also  reprehensible  for  physicians  to  give  certificates  attesting 
the  efficacy  of  patent  or  secret  medicines,  or  in  any  way  to  pro- 
mote the  use  of  them."  Like  all  legislation,  this  is  a  formal 
declaration  of  the  customs  of  the  profession,  which  customs 
are  of  great  antiquit}'.  The  principle  upon  which  it  is  founded 
is  thus  expressed  by  Lord  Bacon  :  "I  hold  every  man  a  debtor 
to  his  profession  ;  from  the  which,  as  men  of  course  do  seek  to 
receive  countenance  and  profit,  so  ought  they  of  duty  to 
endeavor  themselves  by  way  of  amends  to  be  a  help  and 
ornament  thereunto. ' ' 

The  rule,  however,  is  not  always  adhered  to  by  pl^sicians, 
the  most  notable  exception  having  been,  perhaps,  the  use  of 
Koch's  lymph  before  its  composition  was  revealed.  As  regards 
the  patenting  of  surgical  instruments  and  apparatus,  the  opinion 
of  the  great- majority  of  physicians  is  in  accordance  with  the 
rule  just  stated,  but  there  are  some  who  question  its  propriety, 
although  they  obey  it — and  there  are  few  who  would  not  use 
a  patented  instrument  in  a  case  to  which  they  thought  it  was 
applicable. 

The  total  number  of  surgical  instruments  and  appliances 
patented  during  the  past  decade  has  been  about  1,200,  the 
patents  having  been  in  almost  all  cases  taken  out  by  manufac- 
turers. With  these  may  be  classed  dentists'  tools  and  appa- 
ratus, of  which  about  500  have  been  patented  during  the  last 
ten  3^ears,  and  in  this  field  of  invention  the  United  States  leads 
the  world.  The  same  may  be  said  with  regard  to  artificial 
limbs,  of  which  our  great  war  gave  rise  to  many  varieties. 

As  you  know,  the  law  prescribes  that  a  patent  may  be  given 
for  a  "new  and  useful  art,  machine,  manufacture  or  composi- 
tion of  matter."  I  used  to  think  that  the  word  "useful"  in 
this  law  had  its  ordinary  meaning,  and,  therefore,  wondered 
exceeding^  as  to  why  the  Patent  Office  examiners  allowed 
patents  to  certain  things  which  came  under  my  notice.     One 


PROCEEDINGS   OF    THE    CONGRESS.  419 

da}',  however,  I  received  an  article  from  the  Patent  Office,  with 
the  request  for  a  report  as  to  whether  it  was  useful  in  the  sense 
in  which  that  word  was  used  by  the  Office,  namefy ,  ' '  not  per- 
nicious or  prejudicial  to  public  interests — capable  of  being 
used  ' ' — and  then  for  the  first  time  I  understood  one  of  the  first 
principles  of  the  patent  law  of  the  United  States,  that  is,  that 
it  does  not  take  into  consideration  the  degree  of  utility  in  the 
device,  or,  in  other  words,  that  "useful"  means  "harmless." 

If  a  patent  is  granted  to  a  medicine,  it  must  be  as  a  composi- 
tion of  matter  as  a  special  article  of  manufacture.  The  prac- 
tice of  the  Patent  Office  in  these  matters  is  not  generally  under- 
stood. It  does  not  now  consider  that  medical  prescriptions  are 
inventions  within  the  meaning  of  the  law,  or  that  a  mere  aggre- 
gation of  well-known  remedies  to  obtain  a  cumulative  effect  is 
a  patentable  composition  of  matter.  A  certain  number  of  claims 
for  Government.protection  in  the  form  of  patents  or  trade-marks 
are  made  for  medical  compounds  or  for  apparatus,  under  false 
pretences;  that  is  to  say,  the  claim  is  for  a  new  remedy  for  rheu- 
matism or  dyspepsia  or  displacement,  with  a  warning  against 
their  use  under  certain  conditions,  the  real  design  being  that 
they  are  to  be  used  under  precisely  these  conditions  in  order  to 
procure  abortion,  etc.  These  are  sometimes  difficult  cases  for 
the  Patent  Office  to  treat  properly,  for  the  law  does  not  allow 
a  large  discretion  for  refusal  on  mere  suspicion,  and  where  there 
is  ostensible  and  possible  utility  (in  the  Patent  Office  sense)  it 
can  hardly  reject  the  claim  on  the  ground  that  the  invention 
might  be  used  for  immoral  purposes. 

I  said  in  the  beginning  that  I  cannot  on  this  occasion  give 
any  sufficient  account  of  the  progress  of  invention  and  discovery 
in  medicine  and  sanitation  during  the  century  just  gone.  The 
great  step  forward  which  has  been  made,  has  been  the  estab- 
lishment of  a  true  scientific  foundation  for  the  art  upon  the  dis- 
coveries made  in  physics,  chemistry,  and  biology.  One  hun- 
dred years  ago  the  practice  of  medicine,  and  measures  to  pre- 
serve health,  so  far  as  these  were  really  efficacious,  were  in  the 
main  empirical — that  is,  certain  effects  were  known  to  usually 
follow  the  giving  of  certain  drugs,  or  the  application  of  certain 
measures,  but  why  or  how  these  effects  were  produced  was  un- 


420  PROCEEDINGS   OF   THE    CONGRESS. 

known.     They  sailed  then  03'  dead-reckoning,  in  several  senses 
of  this  phrase. 

Since  then  not  only  have  great  advances  been  made  by  a  con- 
tinuance of  these  empirical  measures  in  treatment,  but  we  have 
learned  much  as  to  the  mechanism  and  functions  of  different 
parts  of  the  body,  and  as  to  the  nature  of  the  causes  of  some  of 
the  most  prevalent  and  fatal  forms  of  disease  ;  and,  as  a  conse- 
quence, can  apply  means  of  prevention  or  treatment  in  a  much 
more  direct  and  definite  way  than  was  formerly  the  case.  For 
example,  a  hundred  years  ago  nothing  was  known  of  the 
difference  between  typhus  and  typhoid  fevers.  We  have  now 
discovered  that  the  first  is  a  disease  propagated  largely  by 
aerial  contagion  and  induced  or  aggravated  by  over-crowding, 
the  preventive  means  being  isolation,  light  and  fresh  air ; 
while  the  second  is  due  to  a  minute  vegetable  organism,  a 
bacillus,  and  is  propagated  mainly  by  contaminated  water, 
milk,  food  and  clothing ;  and  that  the  treatment  of  the  two 
diseases  should  be  very  different. 

'The  most  important  improvements  in  practical  medicine 
made  in  the  United  States  have  been  chiefly  in  surgery,  in  its 
various  branches.  We  have  led  the  way  in  the  ligation  of 
some  of  the  larger  arteries,  in  the  removal  of  abdominal  tumors, 
in  the  treatment  of  diseases  and  injuries  peculiar  to  women,  in 
the  treatment  of  spinal  affections  and  of  deformities  of  various 
kinds.  Above  all,  we  were  the  first  to  show  the  uses  of  anaes- 
thetics— the  most  important  advance  in  medicine  made  during 
the  century.  In  our  late  war  we  taught  Europe  how  to  build, 
organize  and  manage  military  hospitals ;  and  we  formed  the 
best  museum  in  existence  illustrating  modern  military  medicine 
and  surgery.  Our  contributions  to  medical  literature  have 
been  many  and  valuable ;  and  our  government  possesses  the 
largest  and  best  working  medical  library  in  the  world.  We 
have  more  doctors  and  more  medical  schools,  in  proportion  to 
the  population,  than  any  other  country,  and  while  this  is  not 
good  evidence  of  progress,  I  am  glad  to  be  able  to  say  that  the 
standard  of  acquirements  in  medical  education  has  been,  and 
is  now  rising,  and  our  leading  medical  schools  are  now  being 
equipped  with  buildings,    with  apparatus,   with  laboratories, 


PROCEEDINGS   OF    THE    CONGRESS.  421 

and  most  important  of  all,  with  brains,  which  enable  them  to 
give  means  of  practical  instruction  equal  to  any  to  be  found 
elsewhere. 

As  regards  preventive  public  medicine  and  sanitation,  we 
have  not  made  so  many  valuable  contributions  to  the  world's 
stock  of  knowledge — chiefly  because,  until  quite  recently,  we 
have  not  had  the  stimulus  to  persistent  effort  which  comes 
from  density  of  population  and  its  complicated  relation  to 
sewage  disposal  and  water  supplies  ;  nor  have  we  had  the  in- 
formation relative  to  localized  causes  of  disease  and  death, 
which  is  the  essential  foundation  of  public  hygiene,  and  which 
can  only  be  obtained  by  a  proper  system  of  vital  statistics. 
We  can,  however,  show  enough  and  to  spare  of  inventions  in 
the  way  of  sanitary  appliances,  fixtures  and  systems  for  house 
drainage,  sewerage,  etc.  ;  for  the  ingenuity  of  inventors  has 
kept  pace  with  the  increasing  demands  for  protection  from  the 
effects  of  the  decomposition  of  waste  matters,  as  increase  of 
knowledge  has  made  these  known  to  us.  The  total  number  of 
patents  granted  for  sanitary  appliances  during  the  last  decade 
(18S0-1890)  is  about  1,175.  If  good  fixtures  necessarily  in- 
volve good  plumbing  work,  we  could  easily  make  our  houses 
safe  so  far  as  drainage  is  concerned  ;  but  a  leaky  joint  or  a 
tilted  trap  makes  the  best  appliance  worthless.  The  im- 
pulse to  improvements  in  this  direction  has  come  mainly  from 
England,  where  most  of  the  principles  of  good  work  of  this 
kind  have  been  developed  ;  but  we  have  devised  some  details 
better  adapted  to  our  climate  and  modes  of  construction,  and 
while  many  of  the  patent  traps  and  sewer-gas  excluders  are 
only  useful  in  the  patent  law  sense,  and  some  not  even  in  that, 
it  is  nevertheless  true  that  the  safety,  accessibility  and  good 
appearance  of  plumber's  work  has  been  largely  increased 
during  the  last  few  years  by  patented  inventions.  Much  the 
same  may  be  said  with  regard  to  heating  appliances,  including 
ventilating  stoves  and  fireplaces,  radiators,  etc.,  but  I  am 
unable  to  express  any  enthusiasm  with  regard  to  what  are 
commonly  called  patent  ventilators. 

Xo  doubt  the  greatest  progress  in  medical  science  during  the 
next  few  years  will  be  in  the  direction  of  prevention,  and  to 


422  PROCEEDINGS   OF    THE    CONGRESS. 

this  end  mechanical  and  chemical  invention  and  discovery 
must  go  hand  in  hand  with  increase  in  biological  and  medical 
knowledge.  Neither  can  afford  to  neglect  or  despise  the 
other,  and  both  are  working  for  the  common  good.  If  the 
American  patent  system  has  not  given  rise  to  any  specially 
valuable  inventions  in  practical  medicine  or  in  theology,  it 
must  be  due  to  the  nature  of  the  subjects,  and  not  to  any  fault 
of  the  system. 


raulortl  


Gay 

PAMPHLET  BINDER 

^^   Syrocose,  N.  Y. 
Stockton,  Calif. 


■jL«e 


SMITHSONIAN  INSTITUTION  LIBRARIES 


ii mill  i 


3   9088   00650   8600 

\T« — 


va 


*\, 


A''r. 


1 


K, 


Kh 


k  \f¥V